Liberal ethics on all their gory display:
Killing Babies No Different From Abortion, Experts Say |Telegraph
The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born…
“The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”
The authors therefore concluded that “what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled”.
Let’s try a little experiment in word substitution in order to clarify the arguments of the ‘ethicists’:
- “
Newborn babiesJews are not actual persons and do not have a moral right to life.”
- “The moral status of
an infanta Jew is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”
- “What we call
after-birth abortion‘The Final Solution’ (killing anewbornJew) should be permissible in all the caseswhere abortion is, including cases where thenewbornJew is not disabled.”
Now let’s return to academia, where the outraged Professor Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, is busy wringing his bloody hands over supposed death threats received by the article’s authors:
He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”…
Hmm. It might seem to the layman that most of the death threats are those being offered by ‘ethicists’ advocating the cold blooded murder of innocent babies. But what does the layman know? Professor Savulescu and his associates are the experts—they have degrees. Let’s try another word substitution:
- “those who made abusive and threatening posts about
the studyNational Socialism were ‘fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society’…”
Ah, yes—the ‘liberal society.’ Eliminate the word “National,” and you’re left with Socialism in all its modern international glory:
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told a House panel Thursday that a reduction in the number of human beings born in the United States will compensate employers and insurers for the cost of complying with the new HHS mandate that will require all health-care plans to cover sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives, including those that cause abortions. Sebelius: Decrease in Human Beings Will Cover Cost of Contraception Mandate | CNSNews.com

Dr. Mengele, eat your heart out.
































Reblogged this on nebraskaenergyobserver and commented:
Margaret Sanger lives again.
Liberals kill ‘em when they’re young & kill ‘em when they’re old:
Dutch mobile euthanasia units to make house calls
If a minute after birth is okay, what about an hour after birth? If an hour after birth is okay, what about a day after birth. If a day after birth is okay, what about a year after birth? If a year after birth is okay, what about 13 years after birth? Teenagers can be such a nuisance, don’t you think?
Especially when said teens grow up to be Democrats … such as Sandra Fluke, the 30-year old law student who wants the federal government to pay for her contraceptives. Oops, she’s now been exposed as a long-time activist:
Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke
Pingback: Saturday Morning Grumpy Daily Headline News | Grumpy Opinions
I sometimes feel like we’re living in the twilight zone. Basic morals, the santity of human life, is just a quaint thought to so many these days. It’s hard to reason with evil, isn’t it?
Evil is now so widespread it’s become banal. Most of these fools consider themselves decent people.
I don’t get to make comments every day, but I read here every day, and I have to say, YOU have out-done yourself! One of the most hard-hitting posts yet!
And to YOU and all other bloggers that DO read here; we’re all fighting hard to save this nation, I don’t know what more we CAN do, but we have to find a way to redouble our efforts…
Ron Paul is a joke and I don’t give as DAMN who gets offended by my saying so, Newt hasn’t got a chance at this time, Santorum is a HUGE *maybe* and Romney is a WHITE Obama.
The last time the GOP offered up such a miserable ticket it was McLame and Bygollydon’tchaknowyoubetcha… Look what THAT got us…
ABO.
I feel your pain.
Paul is 76.
Mitt will be mittens against Obama’s machine.
Santorum is not dirty enough to fend off Obama’s attacks.
Newt has tons of baggage that has already been exposed, whereas, Obama’s baggage hasn’t been, yet.
A good poker player uses patience.
Thanks, FRED. These Oxford academics have the cold-blooded audacity to call themselves ‘ethicists?’ Well, I suppose Hitler’s Ahnenerbe was chock full of similar “good intentions” when they began conducting their medical ‘experiments.’ As far as the GOP, I’ll hold my nose & vote for anybody not named ‘Obama.’
First they killed the old. Then they started killing the unborn and the recently born. Then they started killing the rest of us inbetween! And THAT is exactly what will happen! These libs who pay lip service to how “precious” life is are crazed in the head. Their actions NEVER match their words. Liberalism really IS a Mental Disorder and now that mental disorder is displaying aspects of psychotic murder. These people need to be stopped before they kill us all and don’t hold out hope that they’ll kill each other anytime soon. They won’t start killing each other until we are all dead! We used to put people like this away in the asylums never to see the light of day again. Why aren’t we doing it still? Oh, that’s right, I forgot. Because the psychotics are running this asylum!!
I agree Rob on your point that liberalism is a mental disorder.
I swear, some of these people don’t have the intelligence to operate a toilet.
I, too, posted on this horror.
I urge you to read Wildstar’s comment. Wildstar is one of my high school students. She “gets it” — and on a very personal level, too.
Thanks, AOW.
Ahem! Forget the morality issue for a moment. Think about what she is saying on another level: reducing the taxpayer base down the line.
You know, not every child not born would have been a burden on the taxpayers. We’ve got a serious demographic problem right now — the aging Baby Boomers and a reduced tax base to support the health care of those Boomers. Surely, Sebelius, as the head of the HHS, knows that fact. In 2011, Social Security and Medicare payments were FOURTEEN TIMES the annual federal revenue. Is that surreal, or what?
If we keep electing Democrats, the country’s toast. No doubt about it.
How sad it is to see what our society has become. Great job bringing this to the forefront Bob.
Thanks, SAMI. It is sad. Kill the young, kill the old & screw the ones in the middle …
Classic example of hot air: Activists: Birth control can fight global warming
Leftists … making the rest of us wish that contraception worked backwards.