Trump This

“Obama, you’re Fired.”

“If you are going to be the president of the United States you have to be born in the United States – and there is doubt [about Obama].  If he wasn’t born in this country, it’s one of the great scams.”

–Donald Trump

 

Everybody knows him–Donald Trump, the flamboyant billionaire with the big blond Hair Club For Men comb-over, the real estate baron twice gone bust, the best-selling author (The Art of the Deal), the blunt-spoken boss of television’s The Apprentice, and now a recent convert to the disparaged ranks of those suspicious not only of Barack Obama’s misguided policies, but of his very origins, folks that uncomfortable liberals invariably dismiss as “Birthers” . Of the President’s obsfuscated nativity, “The Donald” remarks,

“There’s something fishy about the whole thing–[if he has one] there’s something on that certificate that’s very bad for him.”

And he’s not the only one asking questions:

  • Dean Singleton, publisher, Denver Post:

“Those are valid questions, and probably should be asked until he does answer. There’s nothing wrong with asking the question over and over.”

  • Charles E. Rice, Notre Dame Law School professor emeritus:

“I suggest no conclusion as to whether Obama is eligible or not. But the citizens whom the media and political pundits dismiss as ‘birthers’ have raised legitimate questions.”

“This is potentially serious business. If it turns out that Obama knew he was ineligible when he campaigned and when he took the oath as president, it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world.”

“As long as Obama refuses to disclose the records, speculation will grow and grow … the first step toward resolving the issue is full discovery and disclosure of the facts.”

  • Chris Matthews, MSNBC:

“I am not a birther. I am an enemy of the birthers. Why doesn’t the president just say, ‘Send me a copy right now?’ Why doesn’t Gibbs and Axelrod say, ‘Let’s just get this crappy story dead?’ Why not do it? … If it exists, why not put it out?”

  • Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Thomas G. McInerney:

“The president of the United States, as the commander in chief, is the source of all military authority. The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen in order to be eligible to hold office. If he is ineligible under the Constitution to serve in that office that creates a break in the chain of command of such magnitude that its significance can scarcely be imagined.”

  • Luke Scott, Baltimore Orioles:

“He was not born here. That’s my belief. I was born here. If someone accuses me of not being born here, I can go – within 10 minutes – to my filing cabinet and I can pick up my real birth certificate and I can go, ‘See? Look! Here it is. Here it is.’ The man has dodged everything. He dodges questions, he doesn’t answer anything. And why? Because he’s hiding something.”

(For a full list of Doubting Thomases and Thomasinas see The BIG LIST of Eligibility Proofers)

The current evidence for Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States consists of his own tepid avowal, an affidavit signed by Nancy Pelosi (“cross my heart and hope to die”), a forensically dubious short-form certificate from Hawaii, a yellowed clipping from a Honolulu newspaper, and the shrill affirmations of a gaggle of partisan Democrats and other assorted Leftists. That’s not even documentation enough to get Charlie Sheen past a pub bouncer.  Lawrence Sellin writes in the Canada Free Press:

Unless I am mistaken, it has always been a Constitutional requirement that a Presidential candidate be a natural born citizen. That is, the candidate must be born in the US of parents who are US citizens at the time of birth.

According to that definition, Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen and, therefore, has never been eligible for the Presidency.

If you’re on the level, Mr. Obama, get out the proof.  And if you’re not, just get out.

Advertisements

About Bob Mack

Retired since 2003. Military Service: U.S. Army, 36th Artillery Group, Babenhausen, Germany 1966-67; 1st Signal Brigade, Republic of Vietnam, 1967-68 Attended University of Miami, 1969-73
This entry was posted in News, Opinion, Video and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Trump This

  1. I sincerely hope that Trump keeps doing what he is doing. The MSM has a hard time ignoring Donal Trump. This can be very good for our cause.

    • Bob Mack says:

      Let’s hope so. There have to be reasons why there’s no documentation on this guy & I’m with Trump–none of ’em are probably any good for Obama.

  2. AFVET says:

    The very fact he refuses to produce the certificate, and the fact that he has blocked ANY access to his school records should raise suspicions in any logically thinking individual.
    I fear that the joke was on US.
    There is also the question of the validity of his SSN.

  3. I am hopeful that Trump has the resources to get to the bottom of this birth-certificate issue.

    I also must say that I cannot understand why Obama doesn’t just produce the paper and shut up this issue altogether. In my view, something is amiss — be it citizenship, religion, parenthood, etc.

    I don’t know how reliable THIS is, but it might be worth taking a look at.

    • Bob Mack says:

      Very interesting article, AOW. Thanks for the link. It makes sense of a few things that have puzzled me. Something is obviously amiss with this guy, from his covert communist ties to a past that’s been thoroughly windexed. In any competent criminal investigation, he’d be the number one suspect (or “person of interest”, as the current euphemism has it).

  4. Bob Mack says:

    Your Papers, please, Mr. President:

    On the Internet, there is an organized, systematic cleansing of Obama-related content.

    Every couple of days I get an email telling me this link, or that link, connects to a “Page not found — 404 error.” The extensive body of Obama web-knowledge, that has evolved over the last 20 years, is shrinking. Stuff that’s considered an Obama smear or unflattering is sent to the Obama ’08 cyber shredding machine. And the campaign is getting help from some really big web service providers.

    A good example is Kristof’s famous New York Times article, in which Kristof quotes Obama saying that the Muslim call to prayer is “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth” and in which Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, “with a first-class [Arabic] accent” — that’s gone — from The New York Times — but it’s here though.

    And, the Trinity UCC website has completely changed. Now, it’s all sweetness and light. Gone are all those great Rev. Wright “God damn America” videos and anti-Israeli Trumpet magazine excerpts.
    There’s less on the web every day. In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of Obama’s 3 bogus novels — “Dreams From My Father” — “The Audacity of Hope” — and the latest — “Change We Can Believe In” — all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his “ghost-writers.”

    Obama has lived for almost 50 years without leaving any footprints — none! There is no Obama documentation — no bona fides — no paper trail — nothing

  5. cmblake6 says:

    Regardless of his place of birth (of which I tend to believe his family and the Kenyan Ambassador before they were told to shut up), he is at best a dual citizen what with his non-immigrant British subject of a father. Even though the definition of the term natural born has been amended to delete the actual birthPLACE requirement, it still requires both PARENTS be citizens of the same country.

    • Bob Mack says:

      The only man ever elected to the Presidency under an alias, CM. Doesn’t say much for the modern voter, does it?

    • Actually, The DEFINITION of Natural Born Citizen was NEVER amended! Where on Earth did you hear that?

      The 14th amendment changed NOTHING with the definition of Natural Born Citizen and if it HAD, it would have been noted in the 14th amendment that it (14th amendment) supersedes article 2 section 1 and it does NOT mention that ANYWHERE, in the Constitution!

      As you can see from the Constitution shown at the link, taken straight from a Govt website, it’s shows the changes/amendments in RED, right after the CHANGED text and Natural Born Citizen was NEVER changed!

      Also, if there were not a DIFFERENCE between Natural Born Citizen and Citizen, WHY would they have inserted BOTH in article 2 section 1?

      http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s