White Flag Over The White House

The malignant intent of the man who occupies the White House has never been clearer.

Even as his toadies in the Pentagon defend his scheme to eviscerate the Army and Marine Corps and return our fleets back to pre-Pearl Harbor levels comes word that Barack Obama plans to simultaneously gut our nuclear arsenal by nearly 80%.  The President of the United States, whose primary responsibility is the protection of the nation, is engaged in unilateral disarmament.

[…] A level of 300 deployed strategic nuclear weapons would take the U.S. back to levels not seen since 1950 (Obama Mulls 80% Disarmament Of Nuclear Arsenal|Newsmax)

The Administration’s record to date is undeniable. Defense was targeted from day one in office, and Mr. Obama disguised his latest, steepest retrenchment as part of a new “strategic review” earlier this month. The Pentagon on Thursday previewed the cuts, announcing that the 2013 defense budget due next month will decline for the first time since 1998. As spending on entitlements rises, budget cuts disproportionately hit the Pentagon, which accounts for a fifth of federal spending but over half the deficit reduction. (Admiral Obama|WSJ)

Obama and Carter represent the dangerous “left of the left wing” Democrat foreign policy establishment, the folks who thought we should surrender to the Soviets, who created the retreat from Saigon, and who rationalized the Iran-Iraq War, which killed a million people after Carter allowed Khomeini radicalism to rise in Iran.  The destruction caused by left-leftist foreign policy “thought” from the Democrats is immense.  Over the years, they have colluded in hundreds of thousands of deaths abroad — covered up by the mainstream media.  They are Lenin’s useful idiots, who colluded in 100 million Communist terror victims in the 20th century alone, and they have not changed one little bit. Such people are dangerous. (How Dangerous Is Obama?|The American Thinker)

And as he mothballs our military, Barack Obama will shovel billions of tax dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood via aid to the so-called “Arab Spring” nations:

[…] The White House announced plans on Monday to help “Arab Spring” countries swept by revolutions with more than $800 million in economic aid, while maintaining U.S. military aid to Egypt. (Islamists Rejoice|Stakelbeck On Terror)

Re-elect this man? He should be frog-marched from office in leg irons.


About Bob Mack

Retired since 2003. Military Service: U.S. Army, 36th Artillery Group, Babenhausen, Germany 1966-67; 1st Signal Brigade, Republic of Vietnam, 1967-68 Attended University of Miami, 1969-73
This entry was posted in News, Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to White Flag Over The White House

  1. Bob Mack says:

    Nuking our Nukes: Lowest level of strategic review would leave Pentagon with fewer warheads than China

    President Obama has ordered the Pentagon to consider cutting U.S. strategic nuclear forces to as low as 300 deployed warheads—below the number believed to be in China’s arsenal and far fewer than current Russian strategic warhead stocks…

    A congressional official said no president in the past ever told the Pentagon to conduct a review based on specific numbers of warheads.

    “In the past, the way it worked was, ‘tell me what the world is like and then tell me what the force should be,’” the official said. “That is not happening in this review.”

    …The plan has come under fire from senior military officers in charge of maintaining nuclear deterrence against Russia, China, and future nuclear rogue states.

    Asked about the opposition, a senior officer involved in strategic arms declined to comment.

    Critics of the nuclear force cuts in Congress and the national security community said the force structure is being studied without matching the need for nuclear forces to combat growing threats, as was done in past strategic nuclear reviews.

    John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador and undersecretary of state for international security during the George W. Bush administration, said in an interview that the administration’s plan to cut nuclear force to as low as 300 “alone is sufficient to vote against Obama in November.”

    “Congress should urgently adopt a resolution rejecting the idea that any of these levels is consistent with American national security,” Bolton said. “Let’s just see who is prepared to support Obama.”

    Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney said even considering such deep strategic cuts is irrational.

    “No sane military leader would condone 300 to 400 warheads for an effective nuclear deterrent strategy,” McInerney told the Washington Free Beacon.

    “Going down to 1000 to 1,100 is risky enough and frankly in today’s world, very risky. The purpose of our nuclear force structure is to deter any adversary from even thinking that they could minimize our attack options. Such thinking is very dangerous and will only encourage our adversaries to make bold decisions.”

    A congressional official and former administration official familiar with the ongoing review said the bottom level warhead levels raise serious questions about whether a nuclear force that size would deter adversaries. It also would raise questions about so-called “extended deterrence,” the threat to use nuclear weapons against states like North Korea on behalf of allies like Japan.

  2. AFVET says:

    What’s it going to take for Americans to wake up and impeach this idiot.
    He doesn’t need Air Force 1 to be president.
    There should be a congressional order to ground that bird unless an emergency exists.
    He will continue to thumb his nose at US until somebody stops him.
    It can be congress, or us at the voting booth.
    If it has to be US, then we take out congress along with him.
    Enough is enough.

    • Concur, Afvet. Ground it. If he, and he alone need to go somewhere, send him on NAECP. And make it the same rules as a nuclear strike: two signatories, one military chain of command.

    • Bob Mack says:

      Well, the Congress ain’t gonna stop him. They took their balls & went home…

      • AFVET says:

        Yeah Bob,..where’s Boehner now that Maxine Waters has called him a ‘demon’.
        He’s afraid of her.
        He’s afraid of her race, her gender, and her liberal fanaticism.
        Where is the ethics investigation Johnny ???
        Are you afraid that she will make you cry again ?
        Grow a pair soon or you are out.

  3. “[…] The White House announced plans on Monday to help “Arab Spring” countries swept by revolutions with more than $800 million in economic aid, while maintaining U.S. military aid to Egypt”

    And this while Egypt is holding how many Americans hostage?

    Well all will be well when Hillary is head of the World Bank and Obama is head of the UN. I can’t wait. Sigh!

  4. Sherry says:

    #*@~ 😡 #%*! ❗

  5. TexasFred says:

    Anyone that served in the military or worked in the Intel community during the Carter or Clinton administration has seen this before, they gutted the military and Intel agencies. Obama is doing likewise. It’s a Dem disease, they want America to be weak and vulnerable.

    I don’t know how many more times this nation can come back from the edge…

  6. Matt says:

    Now, now folks. If you ask any lefty, it’s terribly unfair that we;re able to defend ourselves. In order to be destroyed, we need to be weakened.

  7. One saving grace we can most likely rely on is that the government moves at a glacial pace, so Obama’s proclamation won’t be implemented for another year to 18 months. This will give the next POTUS the ability to resend this idiotic “order.”

    Add another nail in BHO’s reelection coffin.

  8. cosmoscon says:

    It appears that Obama really is trying to be a worse president than Carter. Even Carter didn’t attempt to hurt our ability to defend ourself by this amount. Don’t get me wrong, I think our world wide military presence should be dialed back but let’s do that by strengthening our defenses closer to home. In case Obama didn’t get the memo, our enemies are getting Nukes and their hatred for us has not subsided under his ‘hope and change’ years. Obama must go or I fear there will be no turning back.

    We’ll be worse than Greece. No one wants to invade Greece but if we go into chaos the wolves will be lined up on all shores.

    • Trying? Were I “trying” to break the bank in Vegas to the same extent Obama’s “trying” the be the worst President ever, I wouldn’t have to worry about where my next meal (or the next 100,000 meals) were being paid for.

      In 100 years, assuming Obama isn’t reelected, he will go down as the President who’s done the most damage to our Republic of any three other Presidents combined.

  9. Bob Mack says:

    Don’t know if you saw this, COS: Terrorist Mark Rudd’s Warning on the Destruction of America’s Defenses

    [..] More than two years ago, Cuban trained, former Weather Underground terrorist Mark Rudd, warned us that Obama’s game plan would be to exploit economic crises to push for defense cuts. Rudd, an unrepentant Marxist to this day, works closely with at three people who have been close to Obama in the recent past – Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and Carl Davidson. He is in a unique position to understand Obama’s long term strategy…

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s