[…] Hayes made the comments during his show on Sunday, the day before Memorial Day. He was met with a strong backlash, including from a veterans’ group.
He says he was trying to discuss the divide between the military and civilians but ended up reinforcing a stereotype of a pundit talking about something he hasn’t experienced.
Never say you’re sorry, pal — especially if you’re really not.
Barack Obama’s on-going transformation of the armed forces into a politically correct wing of the Progressive movement may make Obamabots like Chris Hayes happy, but the soldiers that have to deal with the results are of a radically different opinion:
U.S. military veterans overwhelmingly support Mitt Romney over President Barack Obama, according to a poll on Monday.
Vets — who makes up about 13 percent of the population — give Romney a 24-point edge over Obama, 58 percent to 34 percent, Gallup found in its survey released on Memorial Day.
Eric Holder’s ATF thinks that giving weapons to Mexican drug cartels is acceptable, but that the 2nd Amendment rights of American citizens are not? It’s time to get rid of the ATF, the EPA, and every other damned one of these rogue federal agencies that trample on the U.S. Constitution every day of the week:
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is taking a rare step of allowing public comments prior to issuing a decision on a study that could result in outlawing certain types of shotguns currently available to citizens.
The ATF completed a study regarding the importability of certain shotguns. The basis for a possible ban is based on a loosely defined “Sporting Purpose” test. Using the vague definition almost all pump-action and semi-automatic shotguns could be banned as they are all capable of accepting a magazine, box or tube capable of holding more than 5 rounds. Other characteristics determined to be “military” by the ATF can also be used as a basis for a ban.
Where would a budding totalitarian regime be without a program in place through which their useful idiots can snitch on their families, their neighbors, and other assorted “enemies” of the new leftist State?
Turning back to that page out of Stalin’s handbook for good citizenship, the Obama campaign has revived its program of asking Americans to inform on fellow citizens when they see someone, some organization, some politician, or some news outlet “attacking” the Obammessiah.
[…] for Team Obama to urge people to inform on each other over matters political is a disgusting, un-American thing to do. Unfortunately, it seems that such unseemly, un-American attitudes form the basis of the Obama worship we’ve become so inundated with these last eight years.
If you plan on eating pork in Mexico, don’t write about it. At least, not on the web:
The Department of Homeland Security has been forced to release a list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats against the U.S.
The intriguing the list includes obvious choices such as ‘attack’, ‘Al Qaeda’, ‘terrorism’ and ‘dirty bomb’ alongside dozens of seemingly innocent words like ‘pork’, ‘cloud’, ‘team’ and ‘Mexico’.
Here’s an illuminating expose into just who finds the useful idiots of the Left useful:
[…] the real danger to the West, the real threat of communism and socialism is not terrorists or atom bomb spies.
It is the traitors and stooges who infest the mainstream left-The, New Zealand Labour, Australian Labor, the Canadian Liberals, Israeli Labor , the South African ANC, the and most obviously of all, Barack Obama’s Democratic Party.
The real secret of socialism is the ability of small cliques of foreign directed communists and socialists, to direct, through the union movement, peace movement and other pressure groups and direct infiltration, the policies and direction of the mainstream political parties.