Obama: A Syrias Man

Obama Gets Syrias 3Barack Obama, a man whose hawkishness always seems to somehow benefit the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, is at it again.  Using the chemical weapons attack purportedly committed by the forces of Syrian president Assad as his pretext, the ‘morally outraged’ administration of Bombin’ Barry is ready to strike again.  They have, they insist, an “almost air-tight circumstantial case” against Assad, a description that sounds a lot like “jumbo shrimp” or “military intelligence.” Makes ya wonder where all the ‘progressive’ outrage was a few years back when Barry’s much maligned predecessor went after the Baghdad Butcher. Be that as it may, by what dubious authority is the President of the United States authorized to intervene militarily in the civil wars of other nations? Saddam Hussein, at least, was in clear violation of the terms of the 1991 cease fire agreement, and George W. Bush received the reluctant blessings of the United Nations and the U.S. Congress prior to his initiation of hostilities — the approbation of Barack Obama being notably absent at the time:

“The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”  — Barack Obama

Proving that even a blind squirrel can occasionally find an acorn, Obama, for once, was absolutely correct.  But that was then — before he unaccountably replaced Dubya and his thinking, such as it is, evolved.

Assad, of course, denies the use of chemical weapons. There is circumstantial evidence that their employment was in fact a ‘false flag’ attack by the Syrian rebels and sanctioned by Obama himself:

The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.

 A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’

 At any event, Obama, who wants to control everyone’s guns but his own, is hell bent on lending as much of a helping hand to the radical rebels as possible.  He’s been doing so for quite some time:

Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and then-CIA Director David Petraeus were likely behind a mishandled gun-trafficking program that ended up arming the radical jihadist rebels who stormed the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in BenghaziClinton most likely launched the gun program, expected [Ambassador] Stevens to oversee it and then her weapons likely landed in the hands of al-Qaida affiliates who killed Stevens and three other Americans.

Obama … Libya … Egypt … Syria.  Dots that are all connected.  And they all lead to the Muslim Brotherhood.

PTG

Advertisements

About Bob Mack

Retired since 2003. Military Service: U.S. Army, 36th Artillery Group, Babenhausen, Germany 1966-67; 1st Signal Brigade, Republic of Vietnam, 1967-68 Attended University of Miami, 1969-73
This entry was posted in News, Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Obama: A Syrias Man

  1. There are a number of important oil and gas pipelines planned to cross Syria to feed energy hungry Europe. Could petrodollars be the real reason for wanting to enter the war in Syria?

    • Bob Mack says:

      Or is it just not wanting to be mocked? From Da Tech Guy:

      One U.S. official who has been briefed on the options on Syria said he believed the White House would seek a level of intensity “just muscular enough not to get mocked” but not so devastating that it would prompt a response from Syrian allies Iran and Russia.

      He is going to hit them to keep himself from being mocked? What is he a ten year old on a playground? It’s one of the most obscene things I’ve ever heard of in my lifetime.

      God forbid his manhood is ever threatened if he has the nuclear codes nearby.

  2. LD Jackson says:

    I keep hearing the administration say the desired result of any possible US action in Syria is not a regime change. If that is the case, then I can not help but wonder why we would even be considering an attack in the first place. Something just doesn’t smell right.

    • Bob Mack says:

      Well, LD, Obama’s reign has always been characterized by the aroma of 5-day old mackerel in a hot dumpster. What’s surprising is that so many people still find the stench pleasing.

  3. Bob Mack says:

    Why would Assad want to guarantee the military wrath of the United States by using the only weapon short of tactical nukes that could get three ex-peaceniks like Obama, Joe Biden, and John Kerry calling for military intervention against him?

    — Michael Reagan

  4. bunkerville says:

    100,000k dead not so bad, a couple of hundred and we have to lob a few Syria’s way. Stink it does.

  5. Pingback: Obama: A Syrias Man | Grumpy Opinions

  6. Angel says:

    and poor Israelis are already wearing gas maks..what a horror!

  7. Bob Mack says:

    Why Democrats and RINOs should not be elected:

    Sen. James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Armed Services Committee, said the United States simply cannot financially afford to get into a confrontation with Syria.

    “Our military has no money left,” Inhofe said this week.

  8. marine4evrrr says:

    Yep, the “dots are all connected. And they all lead to the Muslim Brotherhood.” Like you say, the dots start with Obimbo and they end up right back at his four-holer… just like every scam he and the DemoNazis try.

    They (Obimbo and crew) try running guns with the Fast and Furious fiasco and it became Fast and Furious, alright… with their panties down around their ankles. Never ones to quit while they’re behind, their answer: “That worked out so well, let’s run weapons on the global scale — BENGHAZI”

    The fun’s gonna start when the sheeple have to start standing in bread lines… and the bread runs out. La-la land turns into zombie land. It’s gonna be great!

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s