Barack Obama, a man whose hawkishness always seems to somehow benefit the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, is at it again. Using the chemical weapons attack purportedly committed by the forces of Syrian president Assad as his pretext, the ‘morally outraged’ administration of Bombin’ Barry is ready to strike again. They have, they insist, an “almost air-tight circumstantial case” against Assad, a description that sounds a lot like “jumbo shrimp” or “military intelligence.” Makes ya wonder where all the ‘progressive’ outrage was a few years back when Barry’s much maligned predecessor went after the Baghdad Butcher. Be that as it may, by what dubious authority is the President of the United States authorized to intervene militarily in the civil wars of other nations? Saddam Hussein, at least, was in clear violation of the terms of the 1991 cease fire agreement, and George W. Bush received the reluctant blessings of the United Nations and the U.S. Congress prior to his initiation of hostilities — the approbation of Barack Obama being notably absent at the time:
“The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” — Barack Obama
Proving that even a blind squirrel can occasionally find an acorn, Obama, for once, was absolutely correct. But that was then — before he unaccountably replaced Dubya and his thinking, such as it is, evolved.
The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.
A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’
At any event, Obama, who wants to control everyone’s guns but his own, is hell bent on lending as much of a helping hand to the radical rebels as possible. He’s been doing so for quite some time:
Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and then-CIA Director David Petraeus were likely behind a mishandled gun-trafficking program that ended up arming the radical jihadist rebels who stormed the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi … Clinton most likely launched the gun program, expected [Ambassador] Stevens to oversee it and then her weapons likely landed in the hands of al-Qaida affiliates who killed Stevens and three other Americans.
Obama … Libya … Egypt … Syria. Dots that are all connected. And they all lead to the Muslim Brotherhood.
- Syria: Is the President of the United States willing to commit a constitutional crime? (onecitizenspeaking.com)
- Growing Evidence Supports Syrian Rebels Launched Chemical Attacks (Freedom Outpost)
- BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program (Townhall)
- Weapons Of Mass Repetition (personalliberty.com)
- FLASHBACK: US ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt’: Report (sgtreport.com)
- FLASHBACK: Obama, Biden Remind That Military Action Requires Congressional Approval (huffingtonpost.com)