Fauxcahontas vs The Bride Of Benghazi

Bride of Benghazi“Let’s be honest and face facts. The Democrat Party is the new communist party in America.” — Allan Erickson (Western Center For Journalism)

Only a Jackass would vote for Hillary Clinton — the pugnacious Bride of Benghazi, famous “What-Difference-Does-It-maker,” and former “vast right-wing” conspiracy theorist — as President of these once United States.  And only a Jackass whose disorder is incurable could possibly cast that same ballot for Dizzy Miss Lizzy, faux member of the Cherokee Nation, and the latest sitting socialist from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.  But, to paraphrase old George Wallace, except for Shrillary’s stridency, there’s really not a dime’s worth of difference between the two.  These are women whose political coloration is a shocking pink.  In days gone by, neither would have gotten within 100 miles of the public purse. But in felonious times like these, when our federal government has “redistributed” (i.e. stolen) $2 trillion from the pockets of 6 of every 10 citizens and divided the spoils with 4 shiftless bums in the parking lot, a pair of undomesticated Democratic termagants like Lizzy and Shrill, neither of whom ever learned to cook much but the country’s goose or to clean out much of anything except the national treasury, are dedicated soldiers in the war waged by women — by leftist women, anyway — against the rest of us.

Which is why the floating of an early trial balloon by the New Republic regarding a possible challenge by the ersatz Cherokee for the 2016 presidential nomination, a selection heretofore believed to be tucked securely away in Hillary’s pink handbag, is so surprising.  The New Republic posits a divide between Clinton’s leftists and Warren’s further-leftists, the latter group spearheaded by disaffected young’uns, who, so the theory goes, are

… angrier, more disaffected, and altogether more populist than they’ve been in years. They are more attuned to income inequality than before the Obama presidency and more supportive of Social Security and Medicare. They’ve grown fonder of regulation and more skeptical of big business.  A recent Pew poll showed that voters under 30—who skew overwhelmingly Democratic—view socialism more favorably than capitalism.  Above all, Democrats are increasingly hostile to Wall Street and believe the government should rein it in.

Well, just about everybody’s hostile to Wall Street these days — even a few former central banksters who now share a bedsheet with it:

[…] Having racked up hundreds of billions of dollars in opaque Fed subsidies, U.S. banks have seen their collective stock price triple since March 2009. The biggest ones have only become more of a cartel: 0.2% of them now control more than 70% of the U.S. bank assets. As for the rest of America, good luck. (Asylum Watch)

But as far as the so-called “millennials,” those under-30 socialists won’t be under 30 for much longer, and nobody wants to enter middle age with only a government-issue mug in which to micturate.  The Jackasses whose goal it is to redistribute everyone else’s wealth certainly didn’t:

President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama are millionaires, worth nearly $6 million by our count. (Forbes)

John Kerry is an American politician who has a net worth of $194 million dollars. (Celebrity Networth)

Nancy Pelosi is certainly not a member of the 99% she so publicly admires, and she doesn’t want to be … the San Francisco Democrat … has a colossal net worth of $196,299,990.  To quote Pelosi during a recent speech about economic inequality: “Something is wrong with this picture.”  (Newsmax)

 [Harry] Reid’s net worth is somewhere between three and 10 million dollars. How he made this money is uncertain, as he has refused to release his tax returns. (The New American)

[Elizabeth] Warren [is] worth as much as $14.5 million. She earned more than $429,000 from Harvard last year alone for a total of about $700,000, and lives in a house worth $5 million. (Hot Air)

There’s no such thing, apparently, as an impoverished commissar.


About Bob Mack

Retired since 2003. Military Service: U.S. Army, 36th Artillery Group, Babenhausen, Germany 1966-67; 1st Signal Brigade, Republic of Vietnam, 1967-68 Attended University of Miami, 1969-73
This entry was posted in Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Fauxcahontas vs The Bride Of Benghazi

  1. boudicabpi says:

    Reblogged this on BPI reblog and commented:
    Fauxcahontas vs The Bride Of Benghazi

  2. Pingback: Fauxcahontas vs The Bride Of Benghazi | Grumpy Opinions

  3. Elizabeth Warren is not going to be the nominee of the Democrat Party and she knows it. Neither is Howard Dean and he knows it. All this is theater to make Hillary look better than the other kooks. Lanny Davis going on FOX and dissing Obama for Obamacare is part of the script as well. Obama is fine with that – it was always part of “the arrangement.” Should the RNC or the R candidate be so “rude” as to bring up “Benghazi”, one of two things will happen – either he or she will be confronted with some information that will silence them, OR a scapegoat will be produced, probably Obama, to say he gave the order to stand down.
    Hollywood and DC want Hillary so bad they can taste it, so we shall have her. Unless…..

    • Bob Mack says:

      Unless the Democrats nominate the other Kerry, you know, the one who actually earned his Vietnam medals (Bob Kerrey, MOH), I suppose I’ll hold my nose & grudgingly vote for the Republican.

  4. It’s your pick, shrill shrew #1, or shrill shrew #2. Choose wisely!

Your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s