Rudi And The Red

Rudi and the Red

“Ex-NYC mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s statement that Barack Obama was influenced by communists in his youth and doesn’t love his country isn’t nearly as fascinating as the reaction to it.” Selwyn Duke

“In Obama [the media] see themselves. What he wants to carry out is what they want and they are going to do what they can to make sure these last two years he gets to do just that, the consequences be damned.  So whether it is going after Rudy Giuliani or going after a Congressional staffer for a slight against the Obama daughters, the media is going to be out to defend Obama at all costs. That’s what the palace guard does … ‘They fight for his successes. He cannot fail.'” Jay Caruso

“Was it that what Giuliani said was demonstrably false? Was it that Barack Obama is supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty? Anyone who simply looks at the factual evidence as to whether Obama loves America, or does not, will find remarkably little to suggest love and a large amount of evidence, over a long period of years, showing his constant close association with people fiercely hostile to this country.” Thomas Sowell

Does Barack Obama love his country?  I suppose the answer to that depends on which country is actually his.  One thing’s for sure: our national media will never bother to find out.  These ersatz scriveners of ours are as malodorous as an outdoor privy in July.  Instead of determining the veracity of Giuliani’s charges, our domestic dung beetles rush to attack his character, his motives, his very sanity.  This is what passes for mainstream journalism in 21st century America. If you’re looking for investigative reporting (unless you’re investigating a conservative), you’d better look online — and you’d better do it fast.  Because Obama and the Democrats are about to shut down their critics.

Critics of President Obama’s “net neutrality” plan call it ObamaCare for the Internet. That’s unfair to ObamaCare. Both ObamaCare and “Obamanet” submit huge industries to complex regulations. Their supporters say the new rules had to be passed before anyone could read them. But at least ObamaCare claimed it would solve long-standing problems. Obamanet promises to fix an Internet that isn’t broken.(From Internet to Obamanet)

The real problem isn’t with what Giuliani said; it’s that he didn’t say enough.

Related stories:
Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Traitor or Idiot: You Decide

Traitor or Idiot


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Moving Further From The Light

BamiesWilliam Shakespeare wrote these words for Macbeth, but insert the president’s name for the first word, “Life,” and you could not have a better description of America’s Nero:
“[Obama‘s] but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.”
President Obama, America’s Nero

“At the risk of being melodramatic, it must nonetheless be said: We are in a war for civilization itself, and Barack Obama is not on the right side.” — Quin Hillyer

bama2“It appears that by a three to one margin presidential scholars are now convinced that Barack Obama has been the worst president ever. For as far left as most in academia are, this is quite a shock, really.” Most Presidential Experts Agree: Obama is Worst President In History

“I tried new positions
I learned his friends names
I made myself sit through football games
Oh, Been jilted
Been jilted again” — The Puppini Sisters

That old Lucky Strike advertising slogan well describes America as a whole as we enter Year Six of Obamunist mis-rule: It’s Toasted.  There are no do-overs in presidential elections, so despite the fact that millions of Obama voters are belatedly realizing that they made two horrible mistakes, they (and we, and the rest of the world) are gonna have to live with the long-term ramifications of the worst decisions the American (or any) electorate ever made.

“Who’s the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?” — Obi-wan Kenobi

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

His Gal Val

My Pal Val

For six years, America has been ruled by a small clique who adroitly bypassed Constitutional checks and balances, while also rendering the mainstream press impotent. No official seems to hold more power over Barack Obama than Ms. Jarrett–someone who never has been fully vetted by investigative journalists and by America’s national security apparatus. Never in America’s history has power been concentrated in the hands of two people less qualified or prepared to lead the free world How Secure Is Valerie Jarrett’s Position in the Obama Administration?

Imagine where we are today: Barack Obama, Frank Marshall Davis’s political godson, and Valerie Jarrett, daughter-in-law to Vernon Jarrett and granddaughter of Robert Taylor—men with links to pro-Stalinism—are the two dominant figures in the White House… Paul Kengor

When I asked a longtime source who left the Obama White House years ago for his impressions of Jarrett, he confessed that he was too fearful to speak with me, even off the record… The Obama Whisperer

Valerie Jarrett, the éminence grise in the mis-administration of Barack Obama, distaff H.R. Haldeman to Barry’s unchecked version of Tricky Dick Nixon, former Chicago slumlord and left-wing dabbler in the real-life game of Risk, is probably the person least likely to be thrown under Obama’s bus, my facetious cartoon and the caterwauling of Democrats scalded by the 2014 election results to the contrary.  Like our mainstream news media, I won’t bother to delve into Val’s history; you can read all about it here.  Suffice it to say that she was nurtured in the same Mid-west network of racists and radicals that harbors such leftist luminaries as Billy Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Jeremiah Wright.

Jarrett is deeply concerned with racial issues. After the tape recordings of Jeremiah Wright’s racist, anti-American diatribes threatened to sink Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, it was Jarrett who encouraged Obama to give his “race speech” at Constitution Hall. African-American administration staffers have said that without Jarrett’s patronage, “their opinions and the often-legitimate concerns voiced by black leaders like [Al] Sharpton would have been thoroughly disregarded …”

In early 2009 Jarrett lobbied President Obama to create the office of Chief Diversity Officer within the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a position filled soon thereafter by Mark Lloyd, an Alinskyite and a former senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. Jarrett also helped recruit Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, who supports the Fairness Doctrine and has argued that Americans should “celebrate tax day.”  Without Jarrett’s patronage, the self-identified communist revolutionary Van Jones would not have gotten his appointment as the Obama administration’s green jobs czar in March 2009. A White House official told Politico that Jones “did not go through the traditional vetting process.” Instead, Jarrett interviewed Jones, a signal that she pushed for his appointment.

In his book Leading From Behind, author Richard Miniter reveals that Jarrett, prior to the May 2011 U.S. killing of Osama bin Laden, repeatedly urged President Obama not to kill the al Qaeda leader, prompting Obama to cancel the mission on three separate occasions—in January, February, and March of 2011.

In 2010-11 Jarrett promoted the California-based solar-power company Solyndra, where one of her wealthiest Chicago connections, billionaire George Kaiser—a leading Obama bundler—held a 35% share in the company.

With bona fides like those, the bus hasn’t been built that’s big enough to run down this woman.  At least, not as long as Obama’s driving it.

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Net “Neutrality”: Turning The Internet Into MSNBC

Dems For Net Neutrality“Obama gave his direction to the FCC in back in early November and lo and behold, the FCC majority has put together President Obama’s plan for Internet regulation … Obama’s plan marks a monumental shift toward government control of the Internet. It gives the FCC the power to micromanage virtually every aspect of how the Internet works Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet is an unlawful power grab.” — FCC commissioner Ajit Pai

“The Fairness Doctrine was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses to both present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was, in the Commission’s view, honest, equitable and balanced.” — Wikipedia

“Think of the press as a great keyboard
on which the government can play.”
― Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Propaganda

Make no mistake: Barack Obama, not the FCC, is the one pulling the strings here.  So-called “net neutrality,” as envisioned by Barry and the Socialists … uh, Democrats, is no more than a thinly disguised attempt to abrogate free speech rights as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“…the movement behind net neutrality—from President Barack Obama to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, and reportedly to New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand—is coming from the left for political reasons. As liberal dominance of the media has waned under the shadow of FOX News, conservative talk radio and websites such as the Drudge Report, some in the Democratic Party have been looking for creative ways to maintain, or regain, the “mainstream media’s” liberal clout. Net neutrality is one way to attain their goal of dominating the media.”Forbes

Obama supporters, useful idiots who would gleefully support the stoning of infants and puppy dogs if they thought it would help Dear Leader in his campaign against capitalism,  are all in favor of so-called “net neutrality,” which they see as a large thumb in the eye of the telecom giants instead of what it really is: a sucker kick to the cojones of American freedom.

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments

Obama and His Selfie Stick

Obama's Selfie Stick

Obama & His Selfie Stick — This is the man who leads the United States?

See more unbridled narcissism here: Which image of Obama mugging for BuzzFeed’s cameras diminishes the presidency the most, ranked

The dwindling number of America’s Obamunists are wont to defend such unseemly presidential preening as mere horseplay.  No argument here.  In what other kind of play would a horse’s ass indulge?


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

The “Random” Thought Of Barack Obama

Obama in 1941

“For the last six years, Obama has acted as if the biggest threat to American security in that part of the world is the Israeli government…” — Charles Krauthammer

“Obama followed up his recent probing and informative interviews with YouTube celebrities by granting an interview to liberal blog Vox, during which he claimed the terror attack on a Paris kosher deli was “random.” It isn’t clear what the president means by calling the attacks “random.” The deli shooter, Amedy Coulibaly, had previously pledged support for ISIS, and his wife even recently filmed a propaganda video for the group calling for more terror attacks on France. Furthermore, the choice of target was far from random. Porte de Vincennes was a kosher deli servicing the local Jewish community. All four of Coulibaly’s murdered hostages were French JewsYahoo Finance

“Obama has sparked some widespread fury over his recent comments to Vox about the Jewish individuals who were brutally killed by terrorists in Paris — specifically, he labeled them “a bunch of folks” who were randomly shot … Obama went on, seeming to place the blame for terrorist attacks at the feet of the United States.” — Washington Times

“Amedy Coulibaly said openly and proudly that he was targeting Jews. No one disputes this, except for Barack Obama … And we know he’s perfectly comfortable denouncing crimes committed in “in the name of Christ” no matter how ancient they may be. But crimes in the name of Allah must not be named as such — or at all.”Jonah Goldberg


Had the Bataan Death March been orchestrated by Muslims instead of the Imperial Japanese Army, Barack Obama would have labeled it a random act of hiking.

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Leave a comment

Obama The Lyin’ Hearted

Obama vs the Crusaders“White House aides are still trying to explain President Obama’s controversial prayer breakfast speech after he reminded Christians that they ‘committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ.'” Breitbart

Not much explanation needed.  The President of the United States is either a Muslim or the best imitation anyone’s ever seen of one.

Related stories:


Posted in Comics & Parodies, Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Obama: Cuba, Si! America, NO!

A Very Obama Christmas

“[Castro] has been a mythological figure to the left-wing press since the 1950s. For 40 years they’ve chosen to ignore the repressive nature of this Stalinist regime that has done so much to try to harm America.” — Brent Bozell

“Obama’s dirty deal with Raul [Castro] will make the worst president in American history Castro’s new best friend … This was not a prisoner exchange. This was a Communist bailout …  The Castro regime is on its last legs. Its sponsors in Moscow and Caracas are going bankrupt due to failing energy prices. The last hope of the Butcher of Havana was a bailout from Washington D.C.  And that’s exactly what Obama gave him.Daniel Greenfield

“Obama is a tyrant the same way FDR was a tyrant. He has a view of presidential power that states: the government is in control of the country, and the president is in charge of the government. He’s taken an imperial view of the presidency.” — David Mamet

Who knows, maybe the old Soviet Union will make a comeback and Obama can re-establish diplomatic relations with them too.  First Fidel, then the heirs of ol’ Nick Kruschchev, then missiles aimed at Miami.  What the heck, he’s already helping the Iranians aim theirs.

Cuba - Branco cartoonOur befuddled media mavens, ideological descendants of the same ’50s scriveners who refused to admit that Castro was a commie until he admitted it himself, are naturally wetting their “unbiased” pink panties over Obama’s Cuban initiative. They, of course, are the same noisome crew who crowed “We’re All Socialists Now!” in 2009, as Red Barry prepared to boldly go where no U.S. president had gone before — on his first global apology tour.  Six years later, with an unbroken string of domestic and foreign policy disasters on the presidential rap sheet, you’d think they’d know better than to continue to put their faith in the man who handed much of the Middle East over to a gang of crucifixated, decapitating goat molesters, unilaterally laid a welcome mat over our southern border, refused to enforce any law he found ideologically suspect, and ran our already untenable national debt up by $7 trillion or so dollars.  Which is a lot of moola, even if a buck today will only buy you what 4 cents did in 1914.

Unless you like overpriced cigars, this is bound to be a bad deal for Americans.

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The GOP Takes A Dive

Christmas Turkey

Boehner and Obama Join to Pass Bill Funding Obamacare and Amnesty

“John Boehner has just squandered the election results before the Republicans even are sworn in.” Rush Limbaugh

“$2.5 billion for illegal immigrants and Obamacare is funded through the fiscal year, that’s a conservative speaker? I don’t think so. It’s a sad day that John Boehner doesn’t realize that there was an election … he is everything that’s wrong with Washington. He’s a Democratic Party-lite … He should not be the speaker. He should be replaced.” Sean Hannity

“I think he ought to be able to pick up some Democratic votes for speaker this time.” Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas)

Barack Obama might consider John Boehner to be his own personal Santa Claus, but for those folks who believe that amnesty and Obamacare are roughly as desirable as an outbreak of herpes in a nunnery — in other words, most of America — the House Weeper is the Grinch who stole Christmas. 

SelloutsThe Obama/Boehner bill is a piece of pork-laden profligacy so atrocious that even a pair of demented hard-core leftists like Nancy Pelosi and the Cherokee Bolshevik from Massachusetts opposed it — and anytime a statist duo like that turns its back on a trillion-plus dollars in proposed federal spending, you know something stinks worse than a road-killed polecat on the 4th of July.  Pelosi and Red Lizzie Warren, of course, are never against spending per se, just on who is permitted to do it. This places them, for once, on the same side of the wire as El Rushbo:

[Campaign finance] limits have practically been obliterated, which means that corporate donors can just start giving left and right. It used to be a limit of $37,000. Now it’s $737,000, something. It’s incredible. But the point of it, do you know why it’s in there? You know why? The Republicans put it in. You know why it’s in there, folks? This is how corporate America’s gonna defeat the Tea Party … it’s a Republican establishment ploy that kind of dovetails nicely with Obama sicking the IRS on the Tea Party to basically eliminate them as a viable threat by relaxing a registration in Dodd-Frank that pretty much permits corporations to spend any kind of money they want on politics … Obama and John Boehner want a bill that the bases of their respective parties reject.

Red Liz, on the other hand, has built a career on bashing Wall Street, a pastime popular since the halcyon days of old Jay Gould (“I can hire one-half of the working class to kill the other half.”).  Not that some of those sticky-fingered stock swindlers and felonious financiers don’t deserve a decent bashing now and again. But, just as not every Democrat is a communist agent (there’s probably one or two socialists), not everyone in the financial markets makes their living by stealing bread from the mouths of widows, orphans, and disabled war veterans.  In fact, without Wall Street, America might well be Mexico without the high standard of living.  In which case, we’d all be sneaking across their border.

Meanwhile, Boehner-clone Mitch McConnell and the beady-eyed pickpocket, Harry Reid,  have professed surprise that Ted Cruz and Mike Lee are holding up the vote on the Cromnibus in the Senate:

 […] the two Republican lawmakers demanded a vote on a proposal to cut funds from the bill that could be used to implement President Obama’s new immigration policy, ending any chance the measure could clear the Senate and be sent to the White House with a minimum of fuss … Senate Republican leaders have pledged to challenge Obama’s immigration policy early in the new year, after the GOP takes control of the Senate. But Cruz suggested they shouldn’t be entirely trusted to keep their pledge. “We will learn soon enough if those statements are genuine and sincere,” he said, in a clear reference to Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker John Boehner.

Why in the world would Ted think that?  Maybe because every time McConnell and Boehner enter the ring, they throw up their hands and holler “NO MAS!” before the bell sounds for Round One.

Related stories:


Posted in Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments